More about this quiz
Dominant Submissive Quiz: Leading, Following or Both?
A dominant submissive quiz explores whether you prefer leading, following, changing roles or focusing on connection. Perhaps you enjoy choosing the pace one evening and receiving an invitation the next. Temple’s result names describe those preferences, without assigning a gender role or deciding what you want to try. Every encounter still requires freely given consent.
What does a dominant submissive quiz describe?
Dominance and submission can describe consensually agreed roles within an intimate experience. They are different from everyday control or coercion. Someone may prefer either role, switch between them, or want neither. A preference does not tell another person what they can do, and consent is specific and reversible.
The Erotic Leader: directing a shared experience
You may like making an invitation or suggesting a pace when both people want that. Leading within an agreed experience does not mean overriding a limit or deciding what someone else needs. A useful reflection is how you respond when a partner asks to change direction. Clear interest in their comfort makes the preference easier to discuss. The quiz cannot assess how reliably you do this in practice.
The Erotic Surrenderer: choosing to follow
You may appreciate someone else taking the lead within clear limits. Choosing to follow can coexist with independence elsewhere in your life; a quiz cannot infer your personality or history from it. Your choices remain active throughout the experience. Describe which parts appeal and which do not, rather than granting broad permission. If following makes refusal feel difficult, that concern deserves attention before any role is explored.
The Switch: a preference that changes with context
You may enjoy leading in one encounter and following in another. That variability does not require an even split or a permanent identity. It may depend on your mood, the relationship or the activity being discussed. Be specific about what you want today rather than assuming an earlier preference still applies. A partner’s interest can differ from yours without either person needing to defend the difference.
The Erotic Mystic: connection takes priority
You may be more interested in presence and mutual attention than in assigning roles. A slow conversation, eye contact or affectionate contact can matter more than who directs it. This is Temple’s description of a pattern in the answers, not a researched personality type or a spiritual status. Keep the parts of the description that fit. You can value connection while also having particular limits or occasional curiosity about roles.
What research adds to this reflection
In Joyal and colleagues’ 2015 survey of 1,516 adults, dominance and submission fantasies were relatively common within the sample. A theme in imagination does not establish willingness to act on it. You might enjoy imagining someone choosing the pace while preferring an equal discussion about any real encounter. Meston and Buss’s research documented varied reasons people give for sex. These findings leave room for different meanings, without validating Temple’s role names or attaching a preference to a gender.
What the research says
- In an internet survey of 1,516 adults, dominance and submission fantasies were relatively common among both men and women in that sample; people who reported one theme were also more likely to report the other (Joyal et al., 2015). Read the source.
- The authors recommend considering a fantasy’s effects and context; uncommon content alone does not establish a mental health condition (Joyal et al., 2015). Read the source.
- Research identified a wide range of sexual motives, including physical, emotional, goal-related and insecurity-related reasons (Meston & Buss, 2007). Read the source.
- A meta-analysis of 48 studies found sexual communication associated with better reported sexual function. The finding shows a relationship between them, without establishing cause and effect (Mallory et al., 2019). Read the source.
What you can explore
- Your preference for leading, following or changing roles
- How role language differs from a gender rule
- The difference between an imagined theme and a chosen activity
- A way to discuss consent and boundaries before exploring
How to use your result
Choose ordinary words for one preference rather than relying on the result label alone. You might like making an invitation, receiving attentive direction or deciding the pace together. Ask what each person would want to leave out and how a pause would be communicated. A previous yes cannot settle a new encounter. You can also decide that the idea belongs only in imagination. The role language is optional, while the ability to choose freely and change your mind remains necessary. If a proposed dynamic makes refusal difficult, step back from it.
What this quiz can and cannot tell you
This quiz is not a validated measure of BDSM roles, relationship safety or psychological health. A preference cannot establish consent, competence or the safety of an activity. If pressure, fear or disregard for boundaries is present, seek appropriate support. An interest in following never requires giving up the right to stop.
Frequently asked questions
What does the dominant submissive quiz explore?
This quiz looks at your reported preferences around leading, following and sharing direction in intimacy. Your result is the Erotic Leader, Erotic Surrenderer, Switch or Erotic Mystic. Those labels offer language for reflection. They do not establish a fixed identity, measure consent or predict whether a particular partner will suit you.
Does enjoying a submissive role mean I am weak?
A freely chosen role says nothing about your strength or worth. You might enjoy following someone else's lead during intimacy and make most decisions elsewhere in life. There is no need to explain that preference through your job or personality. What matters is whether the experience is wanted and your boundaries are respected.
Can I enjoy both dominant and submissive roles?
Yes. 'Switch' is a term some people use for enjoying more than one role. You may prefer leading in one setting and following in another, or have no interest in either. You get to choose the words that fit. A quiz result does not require you to act out any role.
Is this dom or sub test only for people interested in BDSM?
You can take it whether or not you identify with BDSM. Questions about initiation and direction can also relate to ordinary moments, such as choosing how a kiss develops. If you explore a power exchange, discuss its meaning together. A shared label cannot replace clear agreement about the actual activities.
What if my partner and I both prefer to lead?
Similar preferences do not establish incompatibility. You might enjoy taking turns, making decisions together or leaving these roles out of intimacy altogether. Talk about a specific situation that feels awkward, such as both initiating different kinds of touch. Neither partner needs to accept an unwanted role to create a supposed necessary contrast.
Can role preferences change?
Your preferences may differ across situations or relationships. You can notice that change without assigning it to trauma, healing or a hidden psychological cause. Try asking what feels appealing now, rather than what your result says you ought to enjoy. Earlier agreements can be revisited whenever either person's wishes change.
How is consensual dominance different from coercion?
A consensual role depends on agreement, attention to boundaries and the freedom to stop. Calling an action dominant does not make it acceptable if someone does not want it. Discuss the specific activity rather than relying on the label. Either person can withdraw consent at any time without providing a justification.
How can we use our results together?
Read the descriptions separately, then each choose one sentence that feels accurate and one that does not. Compare a small preference, such as who enjoys initiating a kiss. Keep the conversation open to uncertainty. Your results can supply words, while any decision about trying something together remains voluntary.
Research sources
Explore more quizzes
The kink test considers a wider set of interests. Explore the sexual compatibility test or read the guide to expressing a clear request. More starting points appear in Temple’s free sexual wellness quiz collection. To understand why a role can appeal one evening and not the next, read how sexual accelerators and brakes work or what responsive desire is.
The research this is built on
- Rosemary Basson – The female sexual response: a different model (the circular model) (Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 26 (2000), 51–65)
- Rosemary Basson – Using a different model for female sexual response to address women's problematic low sexual desire (Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 27 (2001), 395–403)
- John Bancroft & Erick Janssen – The Dual Control Model of sexual response (Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 24 (2000), 571–579)
- Erick Janssen, Harrie Vorst, Peter Finn & John Bancroft – The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales (Journal of Sex Research 39 (2002), 114–126)
- Cindy Meston & David Buss – Why humans have sex: 237 distinct reasons (Archives of Sexual Behavior 36 (2007), 477–507)
- Sarah Murray, Robin Milhausen, Cynthia Graham & Deborah Kuczynski – A qualitative exploration of factors that affect sexual desire among men aged 30 to 65 (Journal of Sex Research 54 (2017), 319–330)
- Meredith Chivers et al. – Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal (Archives of Sexual Behavior 39 (2010), 5–56)
- David Frederick et al. – Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample (Archives of Sexual Behavior 47 (2018), 273–288)
- Osmo Kontula & Anneli Miettinen – Determinants of female sexual orgasms (Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology 6 (2016), 31624)
- Sheila MacNeil & E. Sandra Byers – Dyadic assessment of sexual self-disclosure and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples (Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22 (2005), 169–181)
- Kristen Mark & Julie Lasslo – Maintaining sexual desire in long-term relationships: a systematic review and conceptual model (Journal of Sex Research 55 (2018), 563–581)
- David Cumming, Michael Quigley & Samuel Yen – Acute suppression of circulating testosterone levels by cortisol in men (Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 57 (1983), 671–673)
- Helen O'Connell et al. – Anatomy of the clitoris (Journal of Urology 174 (2005), 1189–1195)
- Emily Nagoski – Come As You Are (Simon & Schuster, revised 2021)
- Emily & Amelia Nagoski – Burnout: completing the stress cycle (Ballantine, 2019)
- Stephen Porges – The Polyvagal Theory (W. W. Norton, 2011)
- Bessel van der Kolk – The Body Keeps the Score (Viking, 2014)
- Peter Levine – Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma (North Atlantic Books, 1997)
- John Bancroft – Human Sexuality and Its Problems (Elsevier, 3rd edition, 2009)
- William Masters & Virginia Johnson – Human Sexual Response (Little, Brown, 1966)
- Lori Brotto – Better Sex Through Mindfulness (Greystone, 2018)
- Justin Lehmiller – Tell Me What You Want: the science of sexual desire (Da Capo Lifelong, 2018)
- Esther Perel – Mating in Captivity (HarperCollins, 2006)
- David Schnarch – Passionate Marriage (W. W. Norton, 1997)
- John Gottman & Nan Silver – The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (Crown, 1999)
- Brené Brown – I Thought It Was Just Me (Gotham, 2007)
- Peggy Kleinplatz & Charles Moser (eds.) – Sadomasochism: Powerful Pleasures (Harrington Park Press, 2006)
- Ina Schuppe Koistinen – Vulva: Facts, Myths, and Life-Changing Insights (Scribe, 2022)
Developed from the research Temple's method is built on – Emily Nagoski, Rosemary Basson, Bancroft & Janssen, Stephen Porges and Bessel van der Kolk – and in collaboration with Aleksandra Trkulja, Sex & Relationship Therapist; Lauren Lee, Embodiment & Tantra Teacher; Alexandra Wicksell, Mindset & Leadership Coach.
